What Is Wrong With The Ten Commandments?

Bill Meuhlenberg shared his concern about fellow Christians disparaging the Ten Commandments  or the ‘Law of God’. We see that was a concern for Spurgeon back in the 19th century. It was a concern for Lloyd-Jones  and John Stott  in the 20th century and we see it being a concern today. I have come across quite a few Christian websites that say the Old Testament with its Ten commandments no longer apply to the Christian age.

But there obviously is a problem with the ‘Law of God’ among evangelicals with it being discussed online for a while. Albert Mohler is one Christian leader who addresses it in, ‘Why Moralism Is Not The Gospel’. What emphasis should the Christian church put on the Ten Commandments?

Says Mohler, “We sin against Christ and we misrepresent the Gospel when we suggest to sinners that what God demands of them is moral improvement in accordance with the Law. Moralism makes sense to sinners, for it is but an expansion of what we have been taught from our earliest days. But moralism is not the Gospel, and it will not save.” (We could replace the word Moralism with Law or Legalism). Says Mohler, “The only gospel that saves is the Gospel of Christ. As Paul reminded the Galatians, “But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons.” [Gal. 4:4-5] The term ‘under the Law’ generally means under the condemnation of the Law.

Says Mohler, “We are justified by faith alone, saved by grace alone, and redeemed from our sin by Christ alone. Moralism produces sinners who are (potentially) better behaved. The Gospel of Christ transforms sinners into the adopted sons and daughters of God.”

Does this mean that the Law of God ceases to have any regard for the Christian? Not for Mohler:

”The Church must never evade, accommodate, revise, or hide the law of God. Indeed, it is the Law that shows us our sin and makes clear our inadequacy and our total lack of righteousness. The Law cannot impart life but, as Paul insists, it “has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith.” [Gal. 3:24]

Reviewing Tim Keller  the same topic, Bob Hayton, says, “I recently picked up Tim Keller’s new discipleship DVD Gospel in Life: Grace Changes Everything  (Zondervan) [watch the trailer here]. It looks excellent, and I was struck by his description of the Prodigal Son parable and the 3 ways to live.

“Here is a brief summary of his 3 ways to live:

· Religion: I obey, therefore I am accepted by God.

· Irreligion: I don’t need to obey anyone but myself.

· Gospel: I am accepted by God at an infinite cost to Jesus Christ, therefore I obey.”

Says Bob Hayton, “Any effort to take away the idea of Christ’s substitutionary atonement and replace it with a moralism (i.e., being moral, working for others, imitating Jesus) robs the gospel of its power to change us from the inside out. The gospel is, therefore, radically different from religion. Religion operates on the principle: “I obey, therefore I am accepted”. The gospel operates on the principle: “I am accepted through Christ, therefore I obey.” So the gospel differs from both religion and irreligion. Not only can you seek to be your own ‘lord and savior’ by breaking the law of God (i.e., through irreligion), you can also do so by keeping the law in order to earn your salvation (i.e., through religion).”

Stott also has three ways to live in his description of a believer’s attitude to the Law of God. In his three ways Keller includes the non-believer: Stott deals with the attitude of three kinds of believer:

“To sum up, the legalist fears the law and is in bondage to it; the antinomian hates the law and repudiates it; the law-abiding believer loves the law and obeys it.”

Mohler emphasises how deadly it can be for the Christian to try to make himself worthy of God, instead of accepting what Christ has done for us. While I don’t share Mohler’s view on ‘hell’ the Bible does speak clearly that there is a final judgment. There is a day of account for those who have rejected Christ’s offer of salvation, and for those who have accepted it (Hebrews 9:27,28). For those who have accepted Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour their worthiness in Jesus Christ is accepted by God. Eternal life in Christ is not a set of rules or laws, but an abiding relationship with Christ.

That is what the Apostle Paul expresses in his Letter to the Galatians: “I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me” (Galatians 2:20). This is what he says in 2 Corinthians 5:17 happens to a person who is in Christ. “If anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!” It is called the ‘New Birth’ or ‘Born Again’. It is not being ‘good’ or being attached to a church community that puts us right with God. These are outcomes of being in a relationship with Jesus Christ. Jesus said, “this is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent” (John 17:3).

To give ones self over to God means to belong to Christ and to want to belong to His community and to allow Him, through the Holy Spirit, to transform our lives so we seek to be in harmony with his will. It means we have arrived at perfection – not waiting to arrive. The perfection of Jesus’ life He lived on earth is transferred to the believer. Then, when we are in Christ God doesn’t see us as we are, He sees us covered by Christ’s perfection. There is no eternal life without it.

In spiritual terms accepting Christ’s perfection for us is described as ‘wearing the robe of Christ’s righteousness’. There will never be a time as long as we live as mortal beings on this earth that God will accept us for our goodness. God accepts us because we have accepted Christ’s goodness and we have chosen to live our lives with Him. This is God’s grace, (Romans 6:23) or underserved favour to humankind. But, it has to be accepted.

So what is wrong with God’s Law. Nothing! After all, it is His Law. It is what we do with the Law that may be wrong. The Law wasn’t meant to save us; it is intended to show us what we are really like and to send us to Jesus Christ, our Saviour for help and forgiveness. It is not the Law that is the Good News; the Law sends us to the Good News, the Gospel, Jesus Christ, for forgiveness and new life. When Joseph was being seduced by Mrs Potipher he didn’t say, “How could I then do such a thing and sin against the Law.” What he did say was, “How then can I do such a thing and sin against God” (Genesis 39:9). That is what it means to have a relationship with God. It will hurt us to hurt the God who so loved us “that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).

Posted in Apologetics, Christian Mission, Faith & Obedience, Law of God, Saved by Faith, Saved By Grace, The Gospel, The New Birth | 1 Comment

Archaeologist Eilat Mazar & King David

Back in the Spring of this year the BBC presented the controversial programme, ‘The Bible’s Buried Secrets’  featuring the equally controversial Dr. Francesca Stavrakopoulou of Exeter University.

Archaelogist, Eilat Mazar, provides a balance and another side of the story:

“The Biblical narrative, I submit, better explains the archaeology we have uncovered than any other hypothesis that has been put forward. Indeed, the archaeological remains square perfectly with the Biblical description that tells us David went down from there to the citadel. So you decide whether or not we have found King David’s Palace,” asks Eilat Mazar.

“I don’t believe these [modern] archaeologists who ignore the Bible,” she said. “To ignore the written sources, especially the Bible—I don’t believe any serious scholar anywhere would do this. It doesn’t make any sense.”

““That Mazar is a serious scholar is without question. “She’s a good archaeologist,” said Lawrence Geraty, a former ASOR president. “She understands stratigraphy, she knows biblical history; I don’t think she can be dismissed out of hand. Critics want to disparage her work because they have an agenda that doesn’t allow the Bible to contain accurate history.””

“Mazar calls the Bible a historical document. But she also says that it needs to be tested and examined. While evangelicals can appreciate her vigorous defense of the Bible as an independent narrative in the field of biblical archaeology, she does not view it as holy writ.

“I’m not religious,” she said. “The only interest we share is interest in historical sources, either the Old Testament or the New Testament. Everything [in the Bible] is important to me in order to be examined or studied.”

She wrote in a 2006 BAR article, “One of the many things I learned from my grandfather was how to relate to the biblical text: Pore over it again and again, for it contains within it descriptions of genuine historical reality.”

Posted in Archaeology, Bible, History | Comments Off on Archaeologist Eilat Mazar & King David

Our Besetting Sin

As an Adventist, I appreciated Bill Meuhlenberg’s concern about fellow Christians disparaging the Ten Commandments. I collected some thoughts from a few prominent Bible expositors in support of what Meuhlenberg on the Law of God.

But what does it all mean in everyday life? asks Ben Witherington, Then he reminds us “There is an old ditty which goes this way ‘The three persons I admire most are me, myself, and I. Me, myself I know very well, but who’s that other guy?’”

Says Witherington, addressing the current economic crisis in America (shared right now by so many other countries in the world), “You can’t fill a spiritual void with food, or possessions, or investments, or, or, or. The God shaped vacuum in the human soul can only be filled with God, and when that happens then there is a possibility of becoming a ‘recovering narcissist’ who is actually able to love others, and even God after a fashion.” Click to read ‘Our Besetting Sin’.

Posted in Articles, Law of God, The New Birth | Comments Off on Our Besetting Sin

‘Galatians’ by Carl Cosaert

Galatians: A Fiery Response To A Struggling Church by Carl Cosaert is published by the Review and Herald (2011). Cover Price is $12.99. It is a companion book to the Adventist Church’s 4th quarter ‘Studies in Galatians’ and currently available in the UK at the subsidised price of £3.75 plus P&P through the Stanborough Press, Alma Park, Grantham, Lincs, NG31 9SL.

The Bible study guides on The Gospel in Galatians are available on Kindle for £2.94!

Once I began reading Galatians: A Fiery Response To A Struggling Church by Carl Cosaert  I think I only put it down for meal breaks! I had to get on and finish all 14 chapters. It is an excellent commentary on Galatians. I value this book as much as John Stott’s commentary on Galatians, Only One Way. It is one of those books that will have a permanent place in my library.

Adventists are often either misunderstood or misrepresented over their understanding of the Gospel. This book is very readable and will give Adventists and non-Adventist Christians alike what Adventists truly believe and should believe about the Gospel. If I were at Walla Walla I would want to be taking classes by Carl Cosaert!

Table of Contents:

Ch. 1. Saul of Tarsus – From Christian Persecutor to Apostle

Ch. 2. Paul’s Authority and Gospel

Ch. 3. The Issue of Circumcision

Ch. 4. Our New Identity in Christ

Ch. 5. Faith Alone in Christ

Ch. 6. The Priority of the Promise

Ch. 7. The Law as our Paidagogos.

Ch. 8. From Slaves to Heirs

Ch. 9. Paul’s Pastoral Appeal

Ch. 10. The Two Covenants

Ch. 11. Freedom in Christ

Ch. 12. Living by the Spirit

Posted in Apologetics, Books & Book Reviews, Faith & Works, Law of God, Saved by Faith, Saved By Grace, The Gospel | Comments Off on ‘Galatians’ by Carl Cosaert

Dr Billy Graham 93 Today (Monday 7 November 2011)

Billy Graham, the founder of ‘Christianity Today’ at a meeting with it’s Board of Directors “urged the staff who were present never to waver on these two things: the inspiration of Scripture and the centrality of Jesus Christ. And if you do stray on these things, he told them, “you’re likely to get a letter from me!” said Billy Graham.

Posted in Biographies | Comments Off on Dr Billy Graham 93 Today (Monday 7 November 2011)

The Protestant Reformation began, 31 October 1517

The 31st of October is recognised as ‘Reformation Day’  by some sections of the Christian church and even a national holiday in some areas of Germany.

The protests that were publicly nailed to the Wittenberg Cathedral door on October 31 1517, began the most dramatic reform within Christianity-one that prompted their author to also pen a hymn of bold affirmation of our mighty God writes Lucy Neeley Adams. A history of Martin Luther can be found here.

Posted in Biographies, Faith & Works, History, Saved by Faith, Saved By Grace | Comments Off on The Protestant Reformation began, 31 October 1517

Christians And Capital Punishment

In my previous posts it is obvious that I believe in law, I believe in fairness and justice. But do I believe in the opportunity for repentance and forgiveness? But then what about Hitler? Idi Amin? and other tyrants of history – of which there are many. And now there is the killing of Muammar Gaddafi. Some would say he got his comeuppance – but is that the way we human beings should behave?

What about myself? What about the times I have fallen foul of the law and got away with it, and even if not in deed, in thought? What if I had been left so no one would know what evil deed I might do to someone who has seriously wronged me? What if I or a member of my family fell foul of the evil deed of another? The wrong hits out at us every day through the media – the UK prison population currently stands at around 97,000. And some are so evil we might say, they should hang for that!

Where should Christians stand when it comes to capital punishment? Ben Witherington responds.

Posted in Articles, Forgiveness, Punishment | Comments Off on Christians And Capital Punishment

Where Would We Be Without The King James Bible?

“I thank God that I was raised on the KJV. Part of my gratitude is aesthetic. In my ears, none of the modern translations sound nearly so good as, ‘The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want’”

This lengthy article on the King James Version of the Bible is by Professor Mark Noll.

It is followed by links to other articles on the KJV.

‘A Translation Fit For A King’

‘The Most Democratic Book In The world’

‘1611 Publication of the King James Bible’

Posted in Articles, Bible | Comments Off on Where Would We Be Without The King James Bible?

The Law Of God

I have laboured a little over the ‘Law of God’ in the last few posts, deliberately. There are detractors who are critical of Adventists because they believe the Law of God or the Ten Commandments, and the Old Testament, no longer apply to Christians.

The reason for quoting Dr. Lloyd-JonesDr. John Stott  and Charles Spurgeon  is to show that as an Adventist I appreciate their views on God’s Law that it is to point us to the Grace of God and our need of a Saviour, as I have shown elsewhere. When it comes to the ‘Law of God’ it is not Adventists who are out of sync with mainstream Christianity. Adventists can well identify with Meuhlenberg in his concern for ‘Loving God and Keeping His Commandments’

From an Adventist point of view, “The Ten Commandments, the great principles of God’s law, are exemplified in the life of Christ. They express God’s love, will, and purposes concerning human conduct and relationships. Salvation is all of grace and not of works, but its fruitage is obedience to the Commandments, not in hopeless effort to earn salvation, but in grateful harmony with the life and will of Him whose perfect obedience has brought us confidence and acceptance as His sons and daughters.”

This is an Adventist reply to Apologist, Walter Martin, on ‘The Law God’

Edward E. Heppenstall, a leading Adventist Bible scholar and theologian addressed the issue of the Law of God with the apologist, Walter Martin. From the content of Heppenstall’s article it appears Walter Martin would come under the concerns expressed by those in the above links. I’ll try and pick up on Walter Martin’s article on the law in another post. But here is one theologian engaging with another from an opposite camp. Says Heppenstall,

“There is not the slightest hint of any change in the law, in its operation, and its claim upon the individual. But that there is a change somewhere no one can doubt; that change is in the believer. The believer dies with Christ and rises to live with Christ. Certainly there is a change in the believer’s relation to the law. What is this change? Does he now disregard the law? Does he now dispense with it? Does he make the law void? Does Paul support Martin’s contention that the law of God is no longer binding upon the believer? No! Where hitherto he had found himself with “enmity against the law of God,” under its power and condemnation, he now finds himself in harmony with it. And in this new life in Christ he exclaims: “I delight in the law of God after the inward man.”

“Paul is very emphatic in maintaining the integrity of the law of God. Every time there is the slightest possibility that his hearers might conclude there is any change in the law he cries out, “God forbid.” “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law” (Rom. 3:31; 7:7; Gal. 3:21).

“Paul’s concern regarding the law of God makes him cry out not against the law, but against that part of himself that is not subject to the law of God—the old sinful nature (Rom. 7:24). Unfortunately, we find Martin crying out against the law of God. The difference is decisive. To fail to understand the simple difference between “law” as the revelation of God’s will and “under law” as man’s life situation in the flesh when brought under its dominion, is tragic. It seems incredible that a man who claims to be a serious student of the Bible should be guilty of such gross misinterpretation. But the worst tragedy is that many who will read his book will probably believe it.”

It seems to me that Heppenstal finds support for his position in previous posts, summed up by John Stott when he says: “the legalist fears the law and is in bondage to it; the antinomian hates the law and repudiates it; the law-abiding believer loves the law and obeys it.”

So has Adventism shifted out of the Christian mainstream on the Law of God or have its critics?

To read Heppenstall’s full reply to Walter Martin on the Law of God click here:

Posted in Apologetics, Law of God, Saved by Faith, Saved By Grace | Comments Off on The Law Of God

Charles Spurgeon On ‘The Law Of God’

Having lived for a time at Waterbeach (Cattels Lane) I must include something from Charles Spurgeon who began his ministry in Waterbeach. I may have downsized my library in my retirement but I find myself resisting giving away my several volumes of Spurgeon’s Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit,

I know Spurgeon was a Calvinist but his appeal in the last paragraph of this online sermon – surely includes a free-will response?

But just to add one more support to Bill Meuhlenberg’s defence for the ‘Commandments of God’ being relevant today I must add some quotes from Charles Haddon Spurgeon. As Meuhlenberg has protested, there are fellow Christians who dismiss the Law of God and the Old Testament as no longer relevant. So here are some quotes from Spurgeon to add to the previous posts on Dr Martyn Lloyd-Jones.

Charles H. Spurgeon on, “The Law of God.” Extracts from, Metropolitan Tabernacle Pulpit, Vol.28/1882, (Banner of Truth Trust, 1971,pp.277-288 on Matthew 5:18.

“For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

p.277. “We are not under the law as a method of salvation, but we delight to see the law in the hand of Christ, and desire to obey the Lord in all things.”

p.278. “The Law of God must be perpetual. There is no abrogation of it, nor amendment of it.” “Jesus did not come to change the law, but He came to explain it, and that very fact shows that it remains, for there is no need to explain that which is abrogated.”

“To meet the popular error He (Jesus) took care to do some of His grandest miracles on the Sabbath day; and though this excited great wrath against Him, as though He were a law-breaker, yet He did it on purpose so that they might see that the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath . . . and that it is meant to be a day for doing that which honours God and blesses men . . . By thus explaining the law He confirmed it or He would not have needed to expound it.”

p.280. Commenting on Mark 12:30,31, “Those two precepts comprehend the ten at their fullest extent, and cannot be regarded as an erasure of a jot or tittle of them . . .The Ten Commands means all that the two express . . .”

p. 281. The Master did not come to alter the law is clear, because after embodying it in His life He willingly gave Himself up to bear its penalty, though He had never broken it, bearing the penalty for us . . .”

p.282. If He did not remove it, who can do so? If He declares He came to establish it, who can overthrow it?

“The very idea of right and wrong seems to me necessarily permanent, and cannot possibly be shifted . . . not the smallest letter or accent of the moral law can possibly change.”

pp.282-3. “Can it be true that God, by way of forgiving us, has put us under an imperfect law? Would that be a blessing or a curse? It is said by some that man cannot keep a perfect law, and God does not demand that he should. Certain modern theologians have taught this . . . Has God issued an imperfect law? It is the first imperfect thing I have ever heard of His making . . . the law of the Lord must stand, for it is perfect, and therefore has in it no element of decay or change.”

p.283. “The wisest directions for spiritual health, and for the avoidance of evil, are those directions given us concerning right and wrong in the law of God. Therefore it is not possible that there be any alteration thereof, for it would not be for our good.”

p.284. “The law is absolutely complete, and you can neither add to it or take away from it. `For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all . . .'”

“By removing the law you have done away with sin, for sin is the transgression. When you have done away with sin, you may as well as have done away with the Saviour and salvation, for they are by no means needful . . .”

By lowering the law you weaken its power in the hands of God as a convincer of sin. `By the law is the knowledge of sin.'”

p.285. “What is the law of God for? For us to keep in order for us to be saved by it? Not at all. It is sent in order to show us we cannot be saved by works, and to shut us up to be saved by grace; but if you make it out that a man can keep it, you have left him his old legal hope, and he is sure to cling to it.”

“A sliding scale of duty is an immoral invention, fatal to the principles of law. If each man is accepted for doing his best, we are all doing our best . . . have you never heard of the bandit who committed many murders, but who felt he had being doing his best because he never killed anybody on Friday? Self-righteousness builds itself a nest even in the worst character.”

P.286. To tamper with the law is to trifle with the gospel.”

“The law has to be fulfilled in us personally in a spiritual and gospel sense . . . Regeneration is a work by which the law is fulfilled; for when a man is born again there is placed in him a new nature, which loves the law of God and is perfectly conformed thereto.”

Meuhlenberg, Lloyd-Jones, Stott and Spurgeon have presented what is biblical teaching on the function of the Law of God.

Posted in Apologetics, Law of God | Comments Off on Charles Spurgeon On ‘The Law Of God’