“The Power of God Unto Salvation”

For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God” (1 Corinthians 1:18).

In his book, The God Delusion, Published in 2006, Richard Dawkins’ challenged every reason he could think of that shows Christian belief to be false, stupid or harmful. Among the many arguments he poses against the existence of God and Christianity. ‘Arguments for the Existence of God from Personal Experience’, would include for the Christian the biblical terms the ‘New Birth’, or being ‘Born Again.’

In John 3:3-8 we read Jesus saying, “No one can see the kingdom of God unless he is born again. . . . The wind blows wherever it pleases. You here its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.” And in 1 Peter 1:23 we read, “For you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of the imperishable, through the living and enduring word of God.” It has to do with one’s real relationship with God, and placing one’s self under His guidance. It is this that Richard Dawkins repudiates as nonsense on pages 87-92 of TGD.

From his ‘pub talk’ with fellow atheists Dawkins speaks mockingly of people who have supposedly had visions of God or of an angel, or hear God speaking in their heads. He introduces pink elephants and the Yorkshire Ripper, who distinctly heard the voice of Jesus telling him to kill women, and was locked up for life. He then quotes ridicule from the American atheist Sam Harris, finishing with the sentence, “And so, while religious people are not generally mad, their core beliefs absolutely are.” There is more, but this gives enough of what Dawkins understands Christians to mean when they speak of having a personal experience with God?

Apart from presenting Christianity as being bazaar and stupid Richard Dawkins also represents Christianity as being harmful and dangerous. These two ideas were presented from week to week in the Sunday Times Culture Magazine where The God Delusion had been included among the top 10 selling books in its category. Each week the Sunday Times Culture magazine provided the description of The God Delusion as: “Powerful arguments on the irrationality of and harm caused by faith.”

It is these two points of attack in mind, that Christianity is both stupid and harmful, that deserves a reply. I am not here talking of ‘cultural Christianity’, with which Dawkins would feel comfortable.

The Times columnist, Libby Purves, shared her amusement over Richard Dawkins enjoying carol singing. But then she questions, can he sing all the words of the carols without believing what they say. But that is ‘cultural Christianity’.

What we are talking about is the ‘born again’ Christianity that brings about a transformation in a person’s life – from going in one direction to a complete turn around. A turnaround that is inexplicable without recognising the influence of the Christian gospel and the power of God to change people’s lives.

Now there are charlatans out there who claim to be Christian. But one doesn’t write off the good because of the bad, the genuine because of the fake. Jesus warned his followers to, “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves” (Matthew 7:15). Any church is never a museum full of saints. It has been better described as a hospital for sinners! But there should be no room for obvious charlatans!

So what is the strongest evidence that Christianity can put forward for the existence of God? It is true that no one can prove the existence of God. But neither can we prove the non-existence of God. But the best evidence over any other, in my mind, for the existence of a Supreme Being who interacts with humanity, is this very argument of a personal experience with God.

I will allow that there are people who might well fit into Richard Dawkins’ description of what he understands to be a personal experience with God. But I would say it certainly doesn’t fit into the understanding of most Christians.

Taking a statement from ‘Focus’ magazine, Dr. Mart deGroot says, ”Richard Dawkins tars all Christians with the ‘fundamentalist’ brush, and gives plenty of evidence of not knowing the difference between religious faith and quasi-religious madness.”

And then the now retired astronomer finalises by saying, “RD could be taken to task for doing exactly what he condemns Christians for doing: believing certain dictums without proper evidence. His hatred of all things Christians has blinded him to the faults of his own methodology . . . His reasoning is deficient, even abominable, for one wishing to be taken seriously as a scientist.” That is quite an indictment of a fellow scientist by Dr. deGroot.

When a person claims to have an experience with God one thing that should be noticeable is what the Bible calls being ‘born again’ through the Holy Spirit living within. There is a complete turn around in values, attitudes and behaviour. We would know many more illustrations for ourselves. And the question we can ask is, would these illustrations support the two claims by Dawkins, as endorsed by the Sunday Times, that The God Delusion offers “Powerful arguments on the irrationality of and harm caused by faith”(meaning of course, Christianity).

We may all have had our own experiences of coming to God through the Lord Jesus Christ. I have my story, not as dramatic as some I have read. I have never attacked anyone with a knife or a gun – or with my hands, or imprisoned. But there are many such illustrations of the drug addict and the violent whose lives have been changed because of their experience with God – they have been ‘born again’!

Let me just give an illustration. It comes from The Times newspaper, of the 24th May 2008. This is the newspaper that seems to me to have courted Dawkins as much as any other. Yet here was an article that refuted the very claim its sister paper, The Sunday Times, stated each week in its Sunday Magazine, “Powerful arguments on the irrationality of and harm caused by faith.”

The article was titled, How Pedro Martin Nunez found the Lord. Pedro’s picture is no longer in The Times link, but to me he looked like a heavy weight Mafia boss than anything like a preacher. His arms are tattoed with gang symbols, with more on other parts of his body. But that is what the The Times reporter said – Pedro is now a Christian preacher!

Pedro had spent most of his life inside the infamous El Cereso prison in Mexico. Prison life began when he was two and half years old, so one can hardly say he had a good start in life! He was sent there as a child with his mother when she was sentenced to eight-and-a-half years for murdering his father. She had been a heroin addict.

He was released when he was aged 10, but that followed with serving 17 sentences in youth facilities by the time he was 16. Then he was sent back to El Cereso. For Pedro it was like going back home, it was where he had been raised as a child. His own grandfather had sold drugs there. His mother and uncle had served time there. So he knew a lot of people inside. And he had to decide which to join of the two gangs controlling the prison.

I won’t retell Pedro’s first killing of a gang rival when he was 19 as described by The Times journalist. Enough to say that Pedro was ruthless and violent. He was soon promoted within the gang hierarchy of the prison, dealing in drug and protection rackets.

But it was during a period in the isolation section that he learnt his mother had died of a heroin overdose. He became depressed. He was born into the prison environment. He had no values or principles to live by. He even tried to commit suicide.

However, at some stage Pedro was approached by a prison ministry. And surprisingly, this big mafia type criminal was impressed by their kindness. They gave him clothes, they gave him food and they prayed for him. He is said to have cut out his cursing, smoking and drug taking. And then Pedro, this big mafia looking guy says, “God had mercy on me. It was the start of big changes.”

You can read the full story in The Times online. A picture of him is shown here. The upshot of it all is, Pedro is now a Christian pastor revealing the gospel to other gang members. The Times tells us that, “In 1999 the convicted murderer became the pastor of El Cereso. He was released over four years ago for good behaviour (this report was in 2008), and now runs a residential Christian centre for reforming ex-convicts, Unidos por La Cruz – ‘United by the Cross’. He preaches in Juárez and his programmes extend to Chihuahua, the state capital. There he works with children living beneath the streets in drainage pipes.” It is an Amazing story!

He is now married and a father of six. Anthony Lloyd who wrote the story says Pedro has become a symbol of redemption. “‘I still cannot believe the change that has come over my life,’ said Pedro, seated in the chapel of the centre where he conducts services and Bible classes.”

I am sure many of the inmates of that infamous prison also found it hard to believe this story of change in Pedro’s life. But that is the power of the Bible! For me, it is this kind of story of a personal experience with God, that brings about an unexplained change in one’s life, that I find convincing for the truth about Christianity. As the Apostle Paul puts it in 1 Corinthians 1:18: “For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.” This is the power of God’s word – not bringing harm but bringing positive and constructive changes in a person’s life. This story is one among many that gives the lie to the claims that Christianity is stupid and harmful.

The change in Pedro’s life came about through Christian witness and being introduced to the Bible and to the God of the Bible. Pedro in turn has become a Christian witness to others to reveal the divine power that changes lives. The second thing this story says to me is that there is no depth from which God can’t redeem us.

There are a couple of interesting comments that followed this article in The Times online which I took the liberty of borrowing. One is by a David Batchelor from Leasingham in Lincolnshire. It says:

“I wonder what the likes of Richard Dawkins have to say about Pedro’s testimony? God touches the lives of thousands, if not millions of people in different ways. Those who welcome the Holy Spirit into their lives have life-changing experiences that non-believers don’t and will never understand.” It’s true! It was for me before I became a Christian. As the Apostle Paul stated in 1 Corinthians 1:18, “For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.”

Another comment in The Times by Nathan of Inverness read: “Are there ANY humanist answers to this? It gave up on him long ago. There’s no testament to the human spirit here. But this isn’t a lone salvation story but one repeated by countless millions of believers of differing degrees.” This,” said Nathan, “is the amazing, undeserved grace of God.”

And then Nathan suggests, “See why:” and then gives the biblical reference, John 3:16, which is the most well known text in Scripture: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him, shall not perish but have eternal life.” Not just in the future, but it is a new life that begins in the here and now. It is a quality of life that only God can give, and which no one can take away from us.

There are no barriers with God – He is not prejudiced, and even invites the prejudiced! For God, His house is an open house – for whoever will! Isn’t it that what is so good about Christian belief, and something for which Christians rightly give praise to God?

Links to more ‘New Birth’ Stories

http://www.thingsiread.org/2009/07/24/dawkins-superstition/

http://www.thingsiread.org/2009/07/31/dawkins-superstition-ii/

http://www.thingsiread.org/2009/07/31/dawkins-superstition-iii/

Posted in Bible, The New Birth | Comments Off on “The Power of God Unto Salvation”

Review Of ‘God Is Not One’ by Stephen Prothero

In his ‘God is Not One’, Boston University’s Stephen Prothero doesn’t see ‘all religions as different paths up the same mountain.’ “They do not teach the same doctrines. They do not perform the same rituals. And they do not share the same goals.” The full title provides his objective: God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Rule the World—and Why Their Differences Matter.

Read Stan Guthrie’s review:

Posted in Books & Book Reviews | Comments Off on Review Of ‘God Is Not One’ by Stephen Prothero

Our God Is A Forgiving God -Psalm 130

There are three reasons that bring me to Psalm 130. First, it is a beautiful Psalm. Secondly, it fits in so well with this week’s Sabbath Study. And a third reason is an Internet link asking the question: “How Did saints in the Old Testament receive Salvation? Hank Hanegraaff, on the same Christian.com website I subscribe to says, “Many people falsely assume that only the New Testament believers are saved by grace whereas Old Testament believers were saved by obedience to the Law of Moses and not by grace.”

Psalm 130 has been considered one of Martin Luther’s favourite Psalms. One can see why – considering Luther’s struggle with the way of salvation recorded by the historian, Roland Bainton.

Psalm 130 has overtones of the Old Testament Sanctuary. The Old Testament Sanctuary speaks about judgement. The word ‘judgement’ carries a sense of accountability. People don’t like the idea of judgement these days.

But judgement is an important teaching of the Bible. It was taught on a daily basis through the Old Testament Sanctuary system. Throughout the year the sins of the people were confessed over the slain offering and taken into the Sanctuary. Taking the view that there has only ever been one method of salvation, this Old Testament sacrificial system prefigured the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. Jesus would pay the consequences of the sins of all mankind, before as well as after the cross (Hebrews 9:22-26; John 3:16).

Once a year there was a ‘Cleansing of the Sanctuary’ when the high priest would mediate in the Most Holy place on behalf of the people of Israel. And God’s people would depend on the high priest coming out of the Most Holy Place of the Temple to declare that all their sins were taken away (Leviticus 16:29-34).

The New Testament, particularly the Book of Hebrews, tells us that the Old Testament Sanctuary services are a type of what is going on in heaven today. Hebrews chapters 7 – 10 tells us we have a perfect High Priest who is mediating for us in the Heavenly Sanctuary.

In 1 Timothy 2:5,6 we are told, “For there is one God and one mediator between God and men, the man Jesus Christ, who gave himself a ransom for all men . . .” He is the all-sufficient God and only Saviour who alone is our mediator – and being both God and Saviour neither Him nor we need more help than what He provides. When the Judge who sits on the bench of the heavenly assize is also our God, our Saviour and our Friend, what is there to fear?

Mediation suggests the idea of judgement. In Hebrews 9:27 we are told that as we are all destined to die once – then after that we must face the judgement.

The idea of judgement can be quite scary. I recently discovered an old document signed by the local ‘Superintendent of Police’ – dating back to the 24th October 1958. He was giving me notice of his intention to institute proceedings against me. It was related to a motorcycle accident I had ‘at Old Furnace Road, Trecenydd (Caerphilly) at 2.45 on the 18th of October 1958’ (see ‘My Story’). I was being prosecuted on two road traffic offences. It was the first time I had been into a court. The case was dismissed on conflicting evidence but I remember feeling anxious about what the judgment would be. But that is not the way the Israelites felt about God’s judgments on the Day of Atonement.

Judgment can only be scary if we don’t have a right understanding of the judgement, or, we know we are not living right with God. The question the Psalmist asks we would ask too. “If you O Lord, kept a record of sins, O Lord, who could stand?

Psalm 130 is well suited for such an occasion variously known as Yom Kippur, or the Day of Judgement, or the Day of Atonement.

In one way this psalm is very personal. But whatever this personal experience was, it was obviously recorded and constructed to become a national experience; just like we can join in the sentiments of some of the great hymns in our time that come from personal experiences.

It is said of Charles Wesley that he was sitting in his study meditating in one of his down moments when a sparrow flew through the open window and landed on his chest where it appears to have stayed for a moment. Perhaps it was from a state of shock from being pursued by a bird of prey. That experience is said to have given him the inspiration for the wonderful hymn which many Christians still sing and can identify with today: “Jesus lover of my soul, Let me to Thy bosom fly”.  So Israel could readily identify with the sentiments of this psalm on the holiest day of the Jewish year, Yom Kippur. Look at the anticipation and expectation we read in verses 6 and 7:

My soul waits for the Lord

More than watchmen wait for the morning

More than watchman wait for the morning

O Israel, put your hope in the Lord,

For with the Lord is unfailing love

And with Him is full redemption.”

That is what the message of the Sanctuary was about. It was not about totting up sins and seeing how anyone fared on judgement day. As the Psalmist says, if God was to keep a record of our sins against us, “Who could stand?

As mentioned earlier, there are some Christians who separate the New Testament from the Old Testament. They see the Old Testament providing salvation by keeping the Law and the New Testament providing salvation by faith in the grace of God. But that is not what I read in the Old Testament. Apart from it being an obviously very unfair system if it were true, the evidence is that salvation, before and after the cross, was by faith through the Grace of God. We see this expressed quite clearly in Hebrews 11, where we have a record of Old Testament characters who are known to be waiting for the Second Coming of Jesus, because of their faith and trust in God.

As it says in Psalm 130:7, the Sanctuary is about God’s unfailing love. “With Him is full redemption.” It is not partial redemption with God needing to make up the deficit. It is full pardon for all our sins. We have nothing to offer, God provides it all! As Priscilla Jane Owens wrote,

Shout salvation full and free

Highest hills and deepest caves;

This our song of victory:

Jesus saves! Jesus saves!

The Bible image of the Sanctuary tells us that God does not want to hold anything against us. He wants to clear our name of all blame. The Sanctuary was not something the Hebrews feared. It was something they delighted in, and sang about.

The Day of Atonement was a serious time. As Psalm 130:3 puts it, “If you O Lord, kept a record of sins, O Lord, who could stand?” But we also know that the Day of Atonement was a day of rejoicing! As verse 8 concludes, “He himself will redeem Israel from all their sins”.

It harks back to Leviticus 16:29-34 where it says in verse 30, “On this day atonement will be made for you. Then, before the Lord, you will be clean from all your sins.”

God doesn’t keep a little red notebook for Himself where He logs up all the hurts and sins done against Him. We fallen humans might do that, but not God. If God was like that, then the Psalmist had good reason to ask, “Who could stand?” If God kept a record of our sins then we would all sink into the despair of our own sinfulness.

Sin is not something God takes lightly. Sin separates us from Him, and from each other. Forgiveness comes when sin is repented of and forsaken. It does not mean that God is soft on sin and that He will forgive us in our sins. When Pharaoh continually defied God in not letting the Israelites go, Pharaoh died in his sin. It was the same for King Saul. Continual disobedience resulted in the Holy Spirit leaving him. Suicide was his way out! (1 Samuel 13:7-14; 1 Samuel 31:1-10).

Judgement does have a negative side. When John described the ‘Day of the Lord’ in Revelation 6:14-17 the question is spontaneous, “Who can stand?” But the Apostle John assures us in chapter 7 of Revelation that there will be those who will stand secure in the judgement time. And the Psalms also tell us who will stand in the judgement. If we go back to Psalm 24:3-6 we notice how verse 3 begins:

Who may ascend into the hill of the Lord?

Who may stand in His Holy place?

He who has clean hands and a pure heart,

Who does not lift up his soul to an idol

Or swear by what is false.

He will receive blessings from the Lord

And vindication from God His Saviour.

Such is the generation of those who seek Him,

Who seek your face O God of Jacob” (See Genesis 32:26-30).

These are the ones who seek God with all their hearts. The follower of Jesus knows that sin is against God and has cost Him more than we can ever know. It was His Son who died on the cross (Matthew 27:45,46). “By His wounds we are healed”(Isaiah 53:5).

So coming back to Psalm 130:1, “Out of the depths I cry to you Oh God.” If this was the cry of King David after his great sin, we may wonder how he got himself into such a mess in the first place! How could a man whom God elevated to the throne of Israel, reduce himself to the cowardly act of murder to cover his adultery with another man’s wife? (2 Samuel 11). But that is really what happened to David. And when he was told that parable recorded in 2 Samuel 12:1-5, about a prosperous but selfish livestock owner, David was so angry that he unwittingly pronounced his own death sentence. David’s response to Nathan was, “the man who did this deserves to die!

When Nathan, through the direction of the Holy Spirit, penetrated the heart of David with that story of injustice and robbery, David immediately recognised his own condition before God. We read it in Psalm 51:1 “Have mercy on me, O God, according to your unfailing love; according to your great compassion blot out my transgression.” And that is what we have here in Psalm 130:1 and 2:

Out of the depths I cry to you, O Lord,

O Lord, hear my voice,

Let your ears be attentive

To my cry for mercy.”

And, all that went on in the Old Testament Sanctuary system was to show just how merciful as well as just God is, and, how much He loves to forgive if we are willing to repent.

Our God is a forgiving God! As verse 3 points out, God will not “mark” or “keep a record of sins” against us. The Apostle John wrote, “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness”(1 John 1:9).

King David’s experience is not written for us so that we can gloat over his sinfulness. It is not a juicy bit of gossip for the reader to snigger over. It is recorded so that we can glory in the wonderful mercy and forgiveness and grace of God. As verse 8 puts it, “He Himself will redeem Israel from all their sins.”

That is the message of the Bible. In the history of Israel the people of God looked forward to the cross through the symbols of the Sanctuary. When Jesus made his last cry with his last breath on the cross – we are told, “the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom” (Matthew 27:50-51).

The Old Testament Sanctuary teaching tells us what God’s actions in the history of Israel were about. It is about a loving, gracious and redeeming God. That is the reason for the rejoicing in Psalm 130. It was a reason for Israel’s rejoicing. Jesus fulfilled all the promises contained in the practices of the Old Testament Sanctuary. That fulfilment in the cross is the reason for Christians to rejoice too! That for me is the best of religious faith or belief – it is Christian belief.

Posted in Christ's Sacrifice, Sanctuary Teaching | Comments Off on Our God Is A Forgiving God -Psalm 130

An Anglican View On ‘The Bible’s Buried Secrets’

Ian Paul is on the staff of St John’s College in Nottingham. In his review on the second programme of ‘The Bible’s Buried Secrets’ Ian Paul says,

“I hope that, up till now, my comments have been reasonable and responsible. But this is where I get cross. I don’t mind having a good debate about academic matters with other academics, and I understand that FS is an engaging person who has lively debates with colleagues with whom she disagrees within the faculty at Exeter University.

“But what I object to is the unashamed power play that she makes in this programme. She is quite clear—she says it with some glee—that her academic ideas will ‘rock the foundations of monotheistic faith’. I wonder by what right she decides to do this—faith that is important to all sorts of people, to those facing persecution for their belief, for those facing unemployment, or disability, or perhaps even death. I wonder by what right she thinks she can do this?

“The imbalance of power is evident in the programme’s presentation. She contrasts her academic views primarily with the faith of a rabbi, not an academic. When she does bring on a Christian academic, she gives no right of reply, and we have no idea whether he might be able to offer a response to her theories—because he is not invited to. So we here FS’s great sweeping conclusions, and never find out whether those she disagrees with actually have a good reasons for their commitments. I wonder why?”

The first and last of his three reviews can be found here and here.

Posted in Archaeology, Bible, Faith & Science | Comments Off on An Anglican View On ‘The Bible’s Buried Secrets’

The Son Of King David Exists – He Is The Messiah!

For Lent, the BBC dished up for us an anti-Christian fest in ‘The Bible’s Buried Secrets’. To wet our appetite in anticipation of Easter the three programmes questioned ‘Did King David’s Empire Exist?’, ‘Did God Have A Wife?‘ suggesting he did, and ‘The Real Garden of Eden’. That is what the BBC dished up for Lent.

Presented by an atheist scholar the whole idea is the Bible cannot be trusted. I watched the first two programmes but that was sufficient. The presenter came across as if she had made some new discoveries.

Putting something controversial on during Lent was going to attract publicity and an audience. But there was nothing new in the BBC presentations. The Adventist archaeologist, Michael Hasel, wrote an article back in February last year which was published in the Adventist Review, titled, ‘Another Battle Over David and Goliath.’ It addressed the question of ‘Did King David’s Empire Exist’? So it’s not new.

Said Hasel, “In the historical narrative of the Bible one individual attains more prominence, more mention, from Samuel until the last chapter of Revelation. . . . not even Jesus is mentioned as frequently by His name as this individual. His name appears more than 1,100 times in Scripture.”

“He was a great musician, having composed much of the liturgy for Israelite worship that is still sung in synagogues and churches today. He was a poet, a warrior, a great king and leader for his people.

“David as a figure has captured the imagination of millions throughout the centuries and millennia. Artists, such as Michelangelo, have been inspired by his life and personality.

“But David’s centrality in the Bible is exemplified not only in his abilities as musician, poet, warrior, statesman, and hero. His significance is all the more apparent as the pro-genitor of the Messiah. It is through the seed of David—the root of his father, Jesse—that the Messiah was to be born.

“David himself pointed forward in the Psalms to the Messiah that was to come. Both Matthew and Luke include David in their genealogies of Jesus. It was “Joseph, the son of David” who became the father of Jesus (Matt. 1:20, 21).

““Later as Jesus rides on a donkey into Jerusalem in His triumphal entry, the people shout, “Hosanna to the Son of David; blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord” (Matt. 21:9, NASB).

Says, Hasel:

“David is indeed a most central figure in Scripture.

•Without David, there is no founder of Jerusalem.

•Without David, there is no author for Israel’s worship liturgy.

•Without David, there is no United Monarchy of Israel.

•Without David, there is no Messiah.

“It may come as a surprise to many” says Michael Hasel, “that . . . there rages today an intellectual battle over the history of the early monarchy in Israel. In recent years there have been an increasing number of post-modern scholars who are questioning the historicity of the figure of David himself. They question whether he ever existed.”

And so the BBC joined the controversy by dishing up for us its ‘Easter Fest’ with “The Bible’s Buried Secrets,” pretending it was presenting something new, or was the material actually new to the presenter? The Bible was presented as a cobbled together stories and an inaccurate history that has been copied and recopied over centuries so that you would not know the originals if you saw them. The Bible is said to be an unreliable account of history.

There are many replies one can make to the series, and have been made. For now, I’m going to take a passage from the Book of Lamentations as a reply. It is one of those books that adds to the literary value and variety of literature we call the Bible.

The Book of Lamentations is part of the 40% of the Old Testament that is composed in poetry. Its five chapters are a composition of 5 poems, the first four in acrostic form.

The Book of Lamentations is an elegy, or a dirge. It is Jeremiah’s mourning over the destruction of Jerusalem in 586 BC. It is his lament, hence the title, ‘Lamentations.’

For our own Easter message let’s just share a little time looking at Lamentations 1:12. “Is it nothing to you all you who pass by? Look around and see. Is any suffering like my suffering, that was inflicted on me in the day of his fierce anger?”

What was the reason for Jeremiah’s Lament? From Jeremiah 3:6 through to Jeremiah 7:1-7 we read of God pleading with Israel over her sinful condition and making promises, if Israel would only mend her ways. But God’s overtures are ignored, to Israel’s detriment. Israel’s national security depended on their faithfulness to God. When we get to the end of Jeremiah we see what happened to Jerusalem because of the people’s unfaithfulness. Jeremiah 52:12-14,17-23 is just a page back from our text in Lamentations chapter 1.

We read in Jeremiah 52:12-14:

On the tenth day of the fifth month, in the 19th year of Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon, Nebuzaradan commander of the imperial guard, who served the king of Babylon, came to Jerusalem. He set fire to the temple of the Lord, the royal palace and all the houses of Jerusalem. Every important building he burned down. The whole Babylonian army under the commander of the imperial guard broke down all the walls around Jerusalem.” (See the Babylonian Chronicle 5 in the British Museum).

There we have a description by Jeremiah of a real demolition job on Jerusalem and its temple, with all the temple treasures taken off to Babylon. Built by Solomon (and not by David) that temple really represented all that was grand and spectacular about Jerusalem. It was one of the reasons why dignitaries of other countries used to visit Jerusalem, to view its renowned splendour.

Those grand buildings and the splendid sanctuary were raised to the ground by Nebuchadnezzar’s army in 586 BC. So in the Book of Lamentations we get the picture of Jeremiah, sitting on the ruins of his once beloved and glorious Jerusalem. All he had foretold had come to pass!

Now back to the BBC programme for a moment on, ‘Did David’s Empire Exist?‘ First of all, David was the warrior king who united the tribes of Israel and subdued and conquered his immediate neighbours. It was his son Solomon who was the nation builder, even although it was never on the scale of Egypt or Babylon or Assyria. As Ian Paul reminds us in his review of ‘The Bible’s Buried Secrets’, Deuteronomy 7:7 and Deuteronomy 9:1-3 doesn’t suggest King David ruled over an ’empire’ in our understanding of the word empire.  

Secondly, if Babylon demolished all the buildings of Jerusalem in 586 BC, and then the Second Temple, named ‘Herod’s Temple’, was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD, and before and since the destruction of Herod’s Temple Israel has been the corridor that great nations have travelled through to war with each other, and there have been many wars fought over Jerusalem, with lots of rebuilding, should we really be surprised if there is little evidence of Solomon’s building works in Jerusalem?

In my three visits to Israel and to Jerusalem I would be sceptical of any claims of finds purporting to go back to King Solomon, alone to King David!

So back to Jeremiah’s ‘Book of Lamentations.’ Whatever modern warfare can bring about, in Jeremiah’s day Babylon had achieved just as successfully on Jeremiah’s Jerusalem. The glory of Solomon’s high day was obliterated. Israel would never see such splendour again as Solomon had lavished on Jerusalem some 300 years earlier.

And through the poetic devices of personification, the prophet Jeremiah brings to us a moving picture of his once beautiful “Queen of the nations” – now a bedraggled widow, ravished and plundered by a neighbouring nation. Judah was stripped bare and left without dignity and respect. Jeremiah is left bemoaning the loss of her honour. This is what is described for us in Lamentations 1:1-12.

Northern Israel had gone into captivity in 722 BC, and Southern Israel, Judah, had reached its crisis hour, but had refused to face up to it. Judgement fell, – – and its nakedness and shame was all too painful to bear. For Jeremiah the personal pronouns are more than a poetic device. They may personify Jerusalem in one sense, but in another, it reveals the prophet’s own bruising. “Is it nothing to you, all you who pass by? Look around and see. Is any suffering like my suffering that was inflicted on me, that the Lord brought on me in the day of his fierce anger?

The prophet had invested his whole life for the well being of the nation! But now, with the destruction of Jerusalem went all his own hopes and aspirations. As we read in verse 6: “This is why I weep and my eyes overflow with tears. No one is near to comfort me, no one to restore my spirit, my children are destitute because the enemy has prevailed.”

Who were Jeremiah’s children? Jeremiah was not married! He forfeited marriage for his particular call by God. Jeremiah’s children were God’s people! Jeremiah was a spokesman for Someone who was more involved than was Jeremiah. God had ordained the nation of Israel personally. He had made the promise of its greatness to His friend Abraham (Genesis 12:1,2).

God had plagued Pharaoh for Israel’s freedom. He had looked after rebellious Israel for 40 years in the Wilderness. He raised up strong leaders to protect His nation in times of distress and trouble. He fulfilled His promise to Israel under King David. That was the time of Israel’s greatest prosperity and expansion. God was Israel’s glory.

And when Israel went into moral decline, and subsequently into political and economic collapse, God was still involved with His people. God did all He could to save His nation from this awful destruction. Besides Jeremiah, God sent the prophets Ezekiel and Habakkuk. God did all He could to warn Israel of the consequences of its sin and disobedience.

When 586BC came, and Nebuchadnezzar marched away with his booty, leaving behind a plundered and ruined city, the people of Israel were not the only ones who were hurt; God was hurt too! Nearly 1500 years of hope and promises were being marched back to Babylon, the land from which Abraham had originally come.

Today, 586BC is just a historical fact. If you go to the British Museum you can see the Babylonian Clay Tablet that records the date and that great and calamitous event in Judah’s history.

But what about God? Do we ever think of God feeling the intensity of hurt the way Jeremiah expresses it? And yet, five and a half centuries later, God was to experience even greater hurt. It involved the rejection and crucifixion of God’s greatest investment in this fallen world.

Ever since the Fall, God has shared in the hurt of fallen humanity. He had promised restoration and healing through great cost to Himself. But, when God actually “gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16), that rejection of his love hurt as nothing else could!

The Apostle John captures that hurt in his Gospel, in John 1:10,11 where speaking of the coming of God to this world in his Son he says, “He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not. He came unto his own but his own received him not.”

We can feel the pathos in that statement? We sense the ingratitude and coldness? We feel the rejection and loneliness in those words? It is a painful description of how God has been treated by our world. And when leading thinkers of our age throw their barbs at God and undermine what he has done for this world, and is still doing, God feels the pain. He feels for those people too even although they don’t know it, as well as for those who throw away their eternity on the strength of their words.

While God knows the end from the beginning, and while God has full control in His universe, He is involved with humanity more than we will ever know or understand. God has felt the hurt and pain and sorrow of all mankind. It is well described in Isaiah 53: 3-9.  But the intensity of that hurt reached its fullest in Gethsemene, and Calvary.

Jeremiah’s lament over Israel, and for himself and for God, challenges our own tendency to indifference, and to waywardness and disobedience. In this lament we can hear God calling us again. We can hear Him asking us not to ignore His pleas for our salvation as He pleaded with the children of Israel in their day. He offers us eternal security. That eternity has been secured at great cost to Himself.

One day, this old world is going to pass away, along with those who choose to hang on to sin and disobedience. That too will hurt God. He wants us all to be in His New Kingdom. In 2 Peter 3:9 we read “the Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.”

The world too is heading for its final showdown with God, as did Jerusalem of Jeremiah’s day. It is going to come about by God’s intervention in human affairs (2 Peter 3:3-14).

Did King David exist? As Michael Hasel pointed out, if there is no King David then there is no Messiah. But The Son Of King David exists – He is the Messiah! He is Risen!

There are always going to be those who want to discredit the Bible and its message. It is nothing new. But neither is Easter new with its reminder of what God has done for and is still doing for us. This Easter God’s pleadings are still being made.

The most painful and sorrowful of human experiences happened 2000 years ago. It happened for you and for me, and for anyone who hears His cry through the words of Jeremiah: “Is it nothing to you, all you who pass by? Look around and see. Is any suffering like my suffering that was inflicted on me, that the Lord brought on me in the day of his fierce anger?

Posted in Archaeology, Christ's Sacrifice, Easter | Comments Off on The Son Of King David Exists – He Is The Messiah!

John 3:16

For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on John 3:16

The Fury Over Rob Bell’s Hell In ‘Love Wins’

Finishing up on a review of Rob Bell’s 200 page hard back, Kevin DeYoung says, “At the very heart of this controversy, and one of the reasons the blogosphere exploded over this book, is that we really do have two different Gods. The stakes are that high. If Bell is right, then historic orthodoxy is toxic and terrible. But if the traditional view of heaven and hell are right, Bell is blaspheming. I do not use the word lightly, just like Bell probably chose “toxic” quite deliberately. Both sides cannot be right. As much as some voices in evangelicalism will suggest that we should all get along and learn from each other and listen for the Spirit speaking in our midst, the fact is we have two irreconcilable views of God.” Kevin DeYoung’s review of Love Wins is quite comprehensive as well as lengthy.

When DeYoung says the ‘blogosphere exploded over this book’ that describes it well. The above paragraph gives the strength of feeling spread quite widely. Reviewers are not short on expressing a sense of travesty presented in Rob Bell’s ‘Love Wins’.

For myself the reviews I have read are right in that Rob Bell is a universalist; ‘universalist’ in the sense that no one is going to be lost from God’s kingdom despite what they have been. The bad will eventually be made good. There is a ‘restorationist’ theology, a second chance for everyone despite their rejection of God and the gift of eternal life through Jesus Christ in this life. All will be saved in God’s kingdom. It’s not what I read in Scripture – and seems to me to make nonsense of the crucifixion. Why did Jesus go through with what he did if all will be saved anyway? What about texts which says, “God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life” (John 3:16). The two contrasts are presented, we make the choice to perish or have eternal life. As it says in 1 John 5:12, “He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life.” Central to the Christian faith is Jesus Christ; “The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (Romans 6:23). If we die eternally it is not because God has determined it but that we will have chosen it. “The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9).

I felt quite strongly that Bell’s use of Scripture can be very selective to support what for me would pass more as ‘eisegesis’ – reading into the text – rather than exegesis – reading from the text what it says in its context. But there are plenty of reviews to read. Of the reviews I take to Ben Witherington’s review. At the beginning of chapter 7 there are links to the previous chapter reviews – which are not found in chapter 8.

Like DeYoung’s, it is comprehensive and lengthy, unlike DeYoung’s it is chapter by chapter. But despite where there is disagreement there is generosity and respect for the author’s intentions. He does provide alternative views, especially to the general understood idea of ‘Hell’.

Comment 7 on one of his posts by someone called Matthew tells us something of the interest Witherington has created over the issue of life hereafter in his review of ‘love Wins’.

“Thanks for your coverage of this issue and for your willingness to step out of the box from mainstream evangelicalism.

“I, myself, studied this issue a few years back and also came to the conclusion that the conditional immortality view has more on its side than the other 2 popular views (eternal torment and universal reconciliation). As an aside, I prefer the term ‘conditional immortality’ over ‘annihiliationism’ specifically b/c I don’t agree with the Greek notion that souls are naturally immortal. Annihilationism, to me, sounds like God is putting an end to a life that would have otherwise lived forever. I think, rather, that death is simply the natural result of sin-filled life. We only have eternal life in the Son.

“I actually taught the 3 views at our district summer camp 2 years ago and was surprised how open minded the 20-30 people in attendance were once presented with the evidences for each view.”

“It was the grave or sheol. Jesus GRANTED eternal life rather than a simple grave in the ground. Thus the alternative to eternal life is not torment, but death and annihilation.”

Despite the strength of feeling on this subject, or perhaps because of it, there has been increasing interest in the subject of ‘hell’. And so the challenge of Rob Bell’s book. See below for additional comments/reviews on ‘Love wins’.

Ben Witherington can present theological challenges with care and consideration. Because he disagrees with Bell on some things doesn’t mean he throws everything out that Bell believes or writes. It reminds me of William Barclay, I have his commentaries for the insights he gives to biblical backgrounds, but there are some things he believed which I don’t share, such as ‘Universalism’. And neither do I share in the general understanding of ‘eternal hell fire’ where the lost writhe with no release from pain for all eternity. I don’t think this represents in any way the best in Christian belief.

Ben Witherington’s view on eternal torment – ‘Why anihilationism is not universalism

And ‘Hell? No??

Posted in Books & Book Reviews, Views On Hell | 3 Comments

‘The Importance Of The Cross’ by Phillip Yancey

What is the importance of The Cross to the Christian faith? Phillip Yancey shares his thoughts.

Posted in Christ's Sacrifice, Easter, Jesus, Uncategorized | Comments Off on ‘The Importance Of The Cross’ by Phillip Yancey

‘The Life Of All Flesh Is In The Blood’

After my motorcycle accident, (referred to in my story), I recall how conscious I became about the air I breathed. I often used to take in a deep breath and think how good life is. It was the beginnings of the promtings of the conscience over three years that led me to inquire if there really was a God who was responsible for the material universe, and for life on earth. It led me to find the best in Christian belief – a God who has shown his love to us in Jesus Christ – of which we are reminded as we approach Easter. When I read Darwin’s Black Box I wished I could have been science oriented and studied under such as its author, Michael Behe. Although Darwin’s Black Box is not a religious book the revelations of the intricacies of biochemistry increased my admiration and adoration of the Great Designer. I’m reminded of Behe’s book and the idea of Intelligent Design and my personal experience as I read Dr. Ray Pritchard’s short essay on “the life of all flesh is in the blood.”

 

 

Posted in Easter, Faith & Science, Origins | Comments Off on ‘The Life Of All Flesh Is In The Blood’

Albert Mohler: Richard Dawkins And The Limits Of Reason

“In The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution, Dawkins sets out to present his most compelling case for evolution. He is — make no mistake — an ardent enthusiast for his argument. Seldom do we read a book written with such fervor and certitude, with an amazing amount of condescension and anger added to the mix, as well.

““Evolution is a fact,” he asserts. “Beyond reasonable doubt, beyond serious doubt, beyond sane, informed, intelligent doubt, beyond doubt evolution is a fact. The evidence for evolution is at least as strong as the evidence for the Holocaust, even allowing for eye witnesses to the Holocaust.”

“Note that this means, by obvious implication, that all objections to evolution are insane, unintelligent, and uninformed. Read his words carefully. Richard Dawkins is so bold as to assert that anyone who disagrees with him on such a controversial issue is insane, unintelligent, and uninformed, because any sane, intelligent, and informed person would have to agree with him.” To read all of Albert Mohler’s review of Richard Dawkins’ ‘The Greatest Show on Earth’, click here.

Posted in Books & Book Reviews, Faith & Science, Origins | Comments Off on Albert Mohler: Richard Dawkins And The Limits Of Reason