The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife Is Back In The News

“The so-called “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” is back in the news and back in public conversation. The story first broke in a flurry of sensationalism back in September of 2012 whenSmithsonian magazine declared that a papyrus fragment had been found which would “send jolts through the world of biblical scholarship.” Well, it didn’t jolt much of anything.

“In 2012 Professor Karen King of the Harvard Divinity School announced that a papyrus fragment that had come into her supervision made reference to Jesus having a wife. Professor King announced that the papyrus fragment included the words, “Jesus said to them, ‘My wife.’” Smithsonian, which also produced a major television program on the finding, promised that the fragment would “send shock waves through the Christian world.””

“As might be expected, numerous major media outlets jumped on the story. The Telegraph [London] ran a headline that stated: “Ancient Papyrus Could Be Evidence that Jesus Had a Wife.” In reality, says Albert Mohler, . . .

Posted in Apologetics, Articles, Jesus | Comments Off on The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife Is Back In The News

The Intensity Of Christ’s Love

“The love of Christ for us in his dying was as conscious as his suffering was intentional. “By this we know love, that he laid down his life for us” (1 John 3:16). If he was intentional in laying down his life, it was for us. It was love. “When Jesus knew that his hour had come to depart out of this world to the Father, having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end” (John 13:1). Every step on the Calvary road meant, “I love you.”

Therefore, to feel the love of Christ in the laying down of his life, it helps to see how utterly intentional it was. Consider these five ways of seeing Christ’s intentionality in dying for us,” says John Piper

 

Posted in Christ's Sacrifice, Easter, Gospel, Jesus, Salvation, Saved By Grace, The Resurrection | Comments Off on The Intensity Of Christ’s Love

Why Did God Command Abraham To Sacrifice Isaac?

“It is not a true story protested one lady, a Christian representative on a recent BBC ‘Big Questions’ programme. Presenter Nicky Campbell had asked, and what about God asking Abraham to go and sacrifice Isaac’? It might not be the exact words, but it was the question – if God is a kind, loving and merciful God, how could God do such thing to Abraham? Although, Abraham didn’t literally sacrifice Isaac.

Nicky Campbell would have read The God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins. Says Dawkins, “Abraham built an altar, put firewood upon it, and trussed Isaac up on top of the wood. His murdering knife was already in his hand when an angel dramatically intervened with the news of a last-minute change of plan:”

If I wasn’t familiar with the story in Genesis 22 I might well have got the impression that Abraham quietly took off in the early hours of the morning with his toddler child, Isaac, under his arm. Then when out on the top of some mountain he trussed up Isaac like some captive animal and placed him on an altar ready to sacrifice him, – as if Isaac had no say in the matter.

On page 242 of his book, The God Delusion, Professor Dawkins refers to what he calls, “the infamous tale of the sacrificing of Isaac”. On page 265, Dawkins says, “Any modern legal system would have prosecuted Abraham for child abuse, and if he had actually carried through his plan to sacrifice Isaac, we would have convicted him of first degree murder.”

There are Christians who think this story should not be in the Bible. It must be a fabricated story with no truth to it. Or it is not a true story but represents a particular truth. The Christian who said to Campbell the story wasn’t true didn’t have time to explain. Campbell replied, so you accept the soft bits of the Bible but not the hard bits – but then the conversation moved on, that was just part of the ‘opener’ to the topic being discussed.
The problem with her reply is, that the New Testament writers believed it did take place. Hebrews 11:17-19 tells us Abraham “offered up Isaac.” Not really, but although the knife was held back, in intention Abraham did sacrifice Isaac.

Knowing how abhorrent we would feel about child sacrifice ourselves, how could Abraham go ahead and do that. Even more so, how could God even ask him to do it? As Richard Dawkins suggests, in our day such people who acted on claims of hearing such commands from God would be prosecuted for murder, or attempted murder. And they would be rightly locked away for the protection of children and society.

During Abraham’s time and beyond we read in the Old Testament that the custom of child-sacrifice was practiced among Israel’s neighbours. In 2 Kings 3:26 and 27 we read that, ”when the king of Moab saw that the battle went against him, . . . he took his firstborn son, who was to succeed him as king, and offered him as a sacrifice on the city wall.” Chapter 17:31 records that people of foreign cultures “burned their children as sacrifices” to their gods.

Despite the ban by God of such practice the custom found its way into Judah under the later kings, especially under Ahaz and Manasseh. 2 Chronicles 28:3 informs us that Ahaz “sacrificed his sons in the fire, following the detestable ways of the nations that the Lord had driven out before the Israelites.” In 2 Chronicles 33:5 we read that Judah’s king, Manasseh, “sacrificed his sons in the Valley of Ben Hinnom, practiced sorcery, divination and witchcraft, and consulted mediums and spiritists.” So bad was Manasseh that verse 9 tells us he “led Judah and the people of Jerusalem astray, so that they did more evil than the nations the Lord had destroyed before them.” And the strenuous condemnation by the prophets did not save the nation from finally going into Babylonian captivity due to their evil behaviour.

In Genesis 12:2 God had promised Abraham that he would make Abraham into a great nation. Sarah being beyond child-bearing age God assures Abraham that the promise would be kept and that he would personally have an heir out of which a great nation would arise (Genesis 15: 2-6; 18:10). In 15:18 God said to Abraham, “To your descendents I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.” But the wait was too long and Abraham and Sarah did it their way by Sarah’s handmaiden, Hagar (Genesis 16:1-4), a custom of the surrounding cultures to produce an heir. But it wasn’t God’s way. In Genesis 18:10 God declares to Abraham that “Sarah your wife will have a son,” which is what happened.

So we come to this serious final test for Abraham, “Take your son, your only child, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains where I will tell you” (Genesis 22:2). This was his only son, born beyond childbearing age, whom he loved.

Abraham had had his faithless moments. We know he passed his wife off as his sister twice to save his skin. Once with Pharaoh (Genesis 12:10-20), and again with Abimelech, king of Gerar (Genesis 20), and God had to step in each time to save her. And despite God’s promise to give him an heir (Genesis 21: 1-7), he tried to accomplish it his way (Genesis 16).

So Abraham had his failings when it came to trusting God. He was as human as the rest of us. It reminds us of a statement by Charles Spurgeon who once said, “Failure is not in falling but refusing to get up again.” That’s the way Christians see God dealing with failure. He is willing to forgive when we express contrition for our mistakes and to get up and start again (Psalm 51; 1 John 1:9). And that is what God was doing here with this test. “Some time later God tested Abraham . . .. Then God said, ‘Take your son, your only son, Isaac, whom you love, and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains I will tell you about.”

We notice the text says it was God ‘testing’ and not ‘tempting’ Abraham. To tempt is to undermine and weaken character. To test is to strengthen character. Abraham was not being compelled by a tyrant god who needed to be appeased. Abraham was now willing to sacrifice his only beloved son, because God asked him to. And because he knew God well enough he knew God would work out what he was doing to fulfill his promise of a great nation coming from Abraham, even to raising Isaac back from the dead (Hebrews 11: 17-19).

The Bible makes it clear this was a test of obedience. And this was only possible because the Bible makes it clear that Abraham had a special relationship with God. He was known as God’s friend (James 2:23; 2 Chronicles 20:7; Isaiah 41:8). And it was because he had a one and only son that God could also reveal through Abraham what He Himself would do in due course, and Abraham would learn what that meant to God! This was what the Apostle Paul understood about Abraham’s test when he wrote in Galatians 3:8 that God “announced the Gospel in advance to Abraham.”

In this command God shared with Abraham His plan for the redemption of the world. Said Jesus in John 8:56 to the Jewish leaders of His day, “Your Father Abraham rejoiced to see my day, and he saw it, and was glad.” The 19th century Baptist preacher, Charles Spurgeon, asked the question, “When did Abraham see Christ?” Then Spurgeon says, “It was worthwhile for Abraham thus to be tested to have a view of Christ” (Vol. 37:500). The story of the sacrifice of Isaac was an Old Testament prefiguration of the death of Jesus Christ.

In the story of the Emmaus Road recorded in Luke 24, Jesus drew attention to the Old Testament Scriptures which prefigured His death and its meaning (Luke 24:25-27).  Jesus would surely have included Genesis chapter 22 in that enlightening study of the Old Testament, as well as other passages such as Isaiah 53. Richard Dawkins may think unpleasant thoughts about God testing Abraham in this way, but we are told that the outcome of Abraham’s testing was one of rejoicing. He saw Jesus and His intention to bring a solution to the sin problem of the human race.

Abraham’s was a severe test. Isaac was his treasured son, a unique gift from God, born beyond childbearing age. But we are told in Hebrews 11:19 that had Abraham slain Isaac, “Abraham reasoned that God could raise the dead, and figuratively speaking, he did receive Isaac back from the dead”.

Richard Dawkins may complain about God but Abraham had no complaint against God over his testing. For Abraham, it was that arrival of complete faith in God; the experience was worth it. Nearly 2000 years before it happened God gave Abraham a glimpse of Jesus and what He would do for humankind in his death on the cross and in his resurrection. As Jesus shared with his disciples in Luke 24, this should have been a visual aid that would have given Israel some grasp of the mystery of the story of redemption.

Abraham’s obedience and Isaac’s submission to God in this action prefigured the great sacrifice of Jesus Christ on behalf of humanity, for those who lived before – as well as for those who lived after the cross (Hebrews 11:39,40).

In the story it is father Abraham who manages to carry the lighter. It is Isaac who carries the wood! Isaac is no toddler child – he could have resisted his father if he had wanted. He is grown up enough to be loaded with all the timber needed for his sacrifice, and carry it up a mountain! The narrative doesn’t disclose all the detail of the story but one can conclude that once Abraham informed Isaac of his mission, Isaac submitted to his father’s intentions. His father’s God was his own God too! He would be obedient to his father – and to God.

One can see why the Christian Church has seen in Isaac a type of Jesus. His was a miracle birth. He was the ‘only’ child. He carried his own wood and was willing to offer himself as a sacrifice – obedient to God, even to death.

But it wasn’t to be. As Abraham trusted, God would provide the sacrifice (12:7-8), which he did (12:10-14). And again 2000 years later His Unique, One and Only Son, would carry His own wood on which he would voluntarily be crucified.

Just as Isaac was physically capable of resisting his father had he chosen to, Matthew 26:53-54 tells us Jesus could have called on twelve legion of angels for support against His oppressors had He chose, “but” said Jesus, “how then would the Scriptures be fulfilled that say it must happen in this way?

It was not murder, nor martyrdom; it was the offering of God who had become one of us, as a Sacrifice for all who would accept it. The Apostle Paul says the whole human race has sinned; sin is the violation of God’s Law. “The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Jesus Christ our Lord” (6:23).

And this makes sense of Luke 24:25-27 where we read Jesus chiding his disciples for not knowing what the Scriptures taught about Him and the suffering He was to endure. The sacrifice of Christ was no act of ‘Cosmic Child Abuse’ as some might claim; it was the planned voluntary act of God Himself, Jesus Christ (Philippians 2:5-8). “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God” (Ephesians 2:8).

Given in type with Abraham and Isaac, it is in the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus that God has reconciled us to Himself. It is our freedom to accept or reject that act of reconciliation. It is in Jesus that we find the reality of the Gospel and the solution to the world’s problems. This is what we are reminded of at Easter. This is what Abraham caught a glimpse of in his sacrifice of Isaac. It is described for us in John 3:16: “God so loved the world that He gave his only Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life”.

Posted in Biographies, Christ's Sacrifice, Easter, Gospel, Jesus, Saved by Faith, Saved By Grace, The Resurrection, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Why Did God Command Abraham To Sacrifice Isaac?

Seventh-day Adventists: Under Law or Under grace?

I was reading on an evangelical website and came down to its category on ‘Cults’. It mentioned a couple of religious organisations but did not include Seventh-day Adventists (Walter Martin is the one most responsible for removing that undeserved stigma). I did go on to read an inquirer asking about Seventh-day Adventists. The inquirer was referred to Martin’s ‘Kingdom of the Cults’. Martin had written a book on Seventh-day Adventists which is now out of print, except the book is now included in his overall work on the Cults published by Bethany House.

The problem I saw there was, that while Martin exonerates Adventists of the undeserved stigma, and ends up defending Adventists, even rebuking fellow apologist, Anthony Hoekema for his misrepresentation of Adventists, the fact that someone is referred to that book with that title, with no qualifying comment allows the enquirer to draw negative conclusions; ‘the power of association’.

I have read Martin’s contribution to the Christian world on Seventh-day Adventists and shared it on this blog. I have gathered any posts I have on this blog on the Law of God into this one post for the reason it might add some insight to the studies, ‘Christ And His Law’. What is the opposition to Adventists?

For the second quarter 2014 the subject material for Seventh-day Adventists around the world for Sabbath Bible Study is ‘Christ And His Law’. Dr. Keith Burton is the principal contributor and author of the companion book called, ‘Laying Down the Law’ – see Amazon with kindle edition.

Keith Burton is well qualified for his contribution to the subject – (I note that one of his doctoral committee of five included James Packer). There is tension among Christians over the Law of God, did Jesus make it obsolete for New Testament believers, or is it as relevant today as it was when God gave the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai? This is where Walter Martin as a dispensationalist disagrees with Adventists, and Keith Burton gives clarity to the issue by showing why Adventists disagree with dispensationalists. Adventists are often misrepresented as being still in the Old Testament, ‘under law’ as opposed to those who claim we should now be in the New Testament, ‘under grace’.

Highly respected as a Christian apologist, the late Walter Martin is one who stands in the opposite camp to Adventists on the Law of God. But given full access to Adventist literature and archives, he is considered by Adventists as the most honest of our critics. I believe Adventists need to understand where others are coming from in their view of the Law of God to better communicate with honest enquirers of our faith. Walter Martin puts well the views of the opposite camp and I have posted these in the first three links below. The fourth link will reflect an Adventist view on the Law of God – from a Baptist, so a Baptist Vs Baptist; Bill Meuhlenberg Vs Walter Martin! It is worth noting Bill Meuhlenberg’s strength of concern for the Ten Commandments; Adventists couldn’t put it more strongly. I have also included views of the Law of God from other non-Adventist Christians, including Dr. John Stott and Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, considered in some Christian circles as the two leading expository theologians of the 20th century.

In the first three links I draw out Martin’s inconsistency in his criticism of Adventists on the Law of God by falling foul of his own criticism of Hoekema. There has been a lot of reading and selection on my part hence this archive, but if it can be of personal help, or used as a reference for genuine enquirers, then I would consider the task worthwhile. Apart from a few Adventist contributions I have let non-Adventist others well qualified to present the relevance of the Law of God as Adventists would see it. Adventists need not be intimidated by their critics. We are in good company in our belief on the Law of God, as the following links will show:

Anthony Hoekema, Adventists And Walter Martin – Part I

Anthony Hoekema, Adventists and Walter Martin – Part II

Anthony Hoekema, Adventists and Walter Martin – part III

Loving God And Keeping His Commandments by Bill Meuhlenberg

Grace & The Law Of God by Dr. John Stott

Grace & The Law of God by Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones

Charles Spurgeon on ‘The Law of God’

An Adventist Reply To Walter Martin On The Law of God

The Law of God is the Law of love

What is Wrong with the Ten Commandments?

Carolyn Orends finds ‘The Law is Good News’ 

Another Way To Go: Grace Versus Law

The Remedy For Our Sins by Greg Laurie

The Law In Romans 7 – a very lengthy scholarly presentation on rhetoric by Methodist, Dr. Ben Witherington.

Why Do Christians Love Rules by Trillia Newbell
(Also: Grace Frees You To Be Transparent says Trillia Newbell)

Finding God and Grace in ‘Lesmirables’

And to end with an Easter theme: The Fukushima Fifty and the Cross of Christ

Born and raised in, London, Keith Augustus Burton is a professor of religion at Oakwood University:USA. His doctoral dissertation from Northwestern University focused on the role of the law in Paul’s letter to the Romans.

The Bible Study Guides and Dr. Burton’s ‘Laying Down The Law’ is subsidised for this quarter £3.75, and can be purchased direct from Stanborough Press, ABC.

Posted in Apologetics, Faith & Obedience, Law of God, Salvation, Saved by Faith, Saved By Grace | Comments Off on Seventh-day Adventists: Under Law or Under grace?

Is It Faith Versus Science – Or?

In the previous post I said the two views of origins, creation and evolution (meaning atheistic evolution), are often placed over against each other as Faith versus Science. It is not true of course because there are too many well-respected scientists (Here’s a few of them) who are Christians and see science not only supporting their Christian convictions, but science playing no small part for those convictions. For them, science supports the Biblical view of life more than does evolution. It becomes one scientist’s interpretation of the evidence over against another scientist’s world-view. Dr. Gary Parker is a scientist who has held both world-views. He has written materials on Faith and Science but the one I just finished reading is his book: ‘Creation: Facts of Life’. That is the seventh printing, the update is the 13th printing. The amount of printings can say how much the book is regarded. I found it worth reading its 4-5 star reviews on Amazon.

The back cover of my edition tells something about the author:

From Evolutionist to Creationist

“Dr. Gary Parker earned his doctorate in biology, with cognate in geology (paleontology). He has earned several academic awards, including election to the national university scholastic honorary society Phi Beta Kappa, and Science Faculty Fellowship from the National Science Foundation.

“Dr. Parker began his scientific career teaching evolution “enthusiastically” at a respected university. He believed he was ridding his students of “pre-scientific superstitions, such as Christianity. Then he and his wife attended a Bible Study led by a chemistry professor at the university. He soon found out that the errors he tried to point out were his errors.

“He spent the next three years re-examining the evidence before giving up his “deep-seated belief in evolution and concluded, like thousands of other scientists in recent times, that the biblical framework is the more logical inference from our scientific observations.

“Dr. Parker discusses in an easy-to-understand manner DNA, embryo development, fossils, “early man,” symbiosis, genetics, and many other topics: critical issues in the creation/evolution debate.”

The Book also has 4-5 star reviews on the kindle edition of Amazon where one can read the first 15 sample pages of the book. It also gets 4-5 star review ratings on ‘Good Reads

It must have been very difficult for a dyed-in-the-wool evolutionist to alter the views of a lifetime to become a creationist. But having been on both sides of the debate, he communicates well why he changed sides, and with respect for those who believe what he once believed. This respect is noted in the Amazon reviews:

I am including the following description of what he says of his change in becoming a Christian from the 15-page sample on Amazon kindle:

“Dr. Signorino, an excellent Bible teacher, was also a top-notch scientist. He challenged me to look again at the scientific evidence I thought I knew so well. Then Allen Davis, a biologist newly hired at the college, began to share creationist evidences and resources with me, including the famous (or infamous) book by John C. Whitcomb and Henry M. Morris, The Genesis Flood. For three years we argued creation/evolution. For three years I used all the evolutionary arguments I knew so well. For three years I lost every scientific argument. Reluctant and surprised, I finally concluded that what we read in God’s Word is the surest guide to understanding what we see in God’s world.

“Now I’d like to invite you to consider some of the evidences that suggest the “wonderful story” is true after all! And it’s not just me. Thousands of scientists are sharing the scientific evidences in God’s world that encourage us to believe all the wonderful promises and principles in God’s Word, the Bible.

“How can that be? How can scientists — all using the same evidence — come up with such different ideas about what that evidence means? Hasn’t “science” proved the Bible wrong? Don’t we “know” that man created “God” in his image when he reached the stage of abstract thought in evolution? Wouldn’t going back to believing God created man in His image bring back other superstitions and destroy the very fabric of society in our scientific age? Isn’t it unconscionable (and unconstitutional) to mix religion, like the Bible, with science, like evolution?

“People do get “fired up” about creation/evolution. There really are important issues at stake here, both personal and social. That’s all the more reason to hold our emotions in check and to examine our beliefs calmly and thoughtfully. After all, it’s important to know not only what we believe but why we believe it. Being comfortable and confident with our beliefs means that we have honestly considered the merits of beliefs different from ours, and understanding another’s beliefs helps to generate respect and compassion, even if the disagreement is deep, profound, and absolute.

“I love science. This book is especially for those who love and/or respect science. In it I’d like to share with you some of the scientific evidence that helped to change me, as a biology professor, from an enthusiastic (even “evangelical”) belief in evolution to a belief instead that the Bible is the best guide to understanding God’s world and our place in His plan. The Bible contains no explicit references to DNA, mutations, fossils, or the Grand Canyon, so my scientific applications of biblical truths are no better than the evidence I use to support them.

“I also want you to understand evolution clearly and thoroughly, so I’ll also be going over with you — as I still do with my students — all the standard textbook arguments used in favor of evolution.

“Take your time. Be critical. Think it through. It took me three years of re-examining the evidence before I gave up my deep-seated belief in evolution and concluded, like thousands of other scientists in recent times, that the 4 C biblical outline of earth history is the more logical inference from our scientific observations.”

Like so many others, I thought it a good and informative read

Posted in Apologetics, Books & Book Reviews, Faith & Science, Origins | Comments Off on Is It Faith Versus Science – Or?

Cosmic Inflation: Where Did We Come From?

Cosmic Inflation is the current news. The BBC titles David Shukman’s report on the latest scientific discovery: “Cosmic Inflation: Spectacular Discovery Hailed

I’m always drawn to discussions on cosmic origins and of course our human origins, where did we come from? There are basically two views of origins, both faith views, “In the beginning God” and the other is, “In the beginning matter.” The one view says the universe and ourselves came about through an Intelligent Cause, the other view says our creation came about through inanimate material; The one says Intelligence produced material and life, the other says material produced itself and life. We were not there to prove either view.

The one view says, we are here so there must be an Original Cause, the other view says we are here so we must have evolved. It doesn’t say we know how life began in the first place, but given aeons of time and chance it must have happened. That is not science; that is belief. Those two views are often placed over against each other as Faith versus Science. But I know of too many well respected scientists who also believe the former; that Intelligence and not inanimate matter was responsible for the creation of the cosmos and human life on planet earth.

In a previous post I shared my thoughts on the meaning of Christmas. We are now approaching Easter. Easter is the time when we remind ourselves of the purpose of Christmas, as the hymn writer put it, ‘Born that man no more may die, born to raise the sons of earth, born to give them second birth.” In that carol Charles Wesley takes us back to our human origins, as described in the Bible – to creation and the Fall, to the consequences of the Fall for humankind, for us, and Jesus Christ too (Romans 5:1-11). The promised Messiah, our Creator and Redeemer, would take our place for those who place their unreserved trust in him and what he has done for us.

Both Christmas and Easter are rooted in our origins. A loving God planned that should anything go wrong with his creation, he would be the one who would provide the solution, “Born that man no more may die.” 

The question over origins is something I had to settle on early in my life. I have found no reason to change my belief in an Intelligent Cause; a God who has revealed himself to humankind, and finally through Jesus Christ (Hebrews 1:1-3; 13:8). It is for me the best of belief – it provides for me the best explanation of the world in which I live and as I see it, with both its goodness and its evil.

With the current claimed discoveries over the origin of the universe it seemed J. Wallace Warner’s article on origins came into my mail box at an appropriate moment: Is God Real: The Case From Cosmology If God is not real then there is nothing to lose by looking for answers. I’ve told my story elsewhere, but it was a surprise to find the answers for myself. 

Posted in Easter, Evil, Faith & Science, God, Gospel, Incarnation, Jesus, Origins | Comments Off on Cosmic Inflation: Where Did We Come From?

From Father To Son: J.R.R. Tolkein On Sex

Says Albert Mohler, “The astounding popularity of J.R.R. Tolkien and his writings–magnified many times over by the success of the Lord of the Rings films–has ensured that Tolkien’s fantasy world of moral meaning stands as one of the great literary achievements of our times.

In his essay, Mohler invites us to join him in his admiration for Tolkien, not just for his literary success but also as a father figure. “Tolkien dearly loved his children, and he left a literary legacy in the form of letters. . . . not just a hallmark of literary quality, but also on matters of manhood, marriage, and sex. . . a priceless legacy,” says Mohler. “

“In 1941, Tolkien wrote a masterful letter to his son Michael, dealing with marriage and the realities of human sexuality.” “The letter Tolkien wrote Michael in the year 1941–with the world exploding in war and civilization coming apart at its seams–is a model of fatherly concern, counsel, and instruction. We should be grateful that this letter is now accessible to the larger world, and to the rest of us,” says Mohler . . .

 

Posted in Biographies, Marriage & Family, Nature of Man | Comments Off on From Father To Son: J.R.R. Tolkein On Sex

Mom, I’m Bored!

Says the author of this article I’m reading:

“So as a parent, it’s good for me to remember that entertainment is not a right. It’s a privilege—and often, depriving my children of this privilege is the best thing for them. But this is just as true for me; my brain needs ample time to stare off into space. Who knows what LEGO creation my kids will come up with, and who knows what next book idea I’ll find waiting for me deep in the recesses of my bored subconscious?”

But it’s not just about her children she writes, it’s about herself, and us adults too. The author knows where and when she has her greatest ideas, God gave us minds and creativity. We need time to be alone with our own thoughts. Her blog has over 30,000 subscribers  As an example and mentor to her family I can’t imagine them being allowed time to be bored!

 

Posted in Articles, Marriage & Family | Comments Off on Mom, I’m Bored!

Unto Us A Child Is Born

Re-reading, ‘A Letter To Daniel’ by Fergal Keene sent me on a spiritual trail. ‘A Letter To Daniel’ is very emotive and moving, perhaps too subjective for some for a BBC war correspondent.

Fergal Keene’s newborn son, Daniel Patrick Keane, was born on February 4 1996 at the Seventh-day Adventist Hospital in Hong Kong, Britain’s last Asian colony. The letter, for some a literary classic, was broadcast 11 days later. Keene describes how he typed his letter, holding his son to himself with one arm and typing with the other.

Writes the doting dad, “Naturally your mother and I . . . wanted you and waited for you, imagined you and dreamed about you and now that you are here no dream can do justice to you.”

Further on he writes, “And it’s also true that I am pained, perhaps haunted is a better word, by the memory, suddenly so vivid now, of each suffering child I have come across on my journeys. To tell you the truth, it’s nearly too much to bear at this moment to even think of children being hurt and abused and killed. And yet looking at you, the images come flooding back.”

He recalls the genocide in Rwanda. Keene comes across as very sensitive to the good and evil in our world, and frets that his own newborn will not come to the harm of which he has seen so much.

In closing his letter he says, “Yet now Daniel, I must tell you that when you let out your first powerful cry in the delivery room of the Adventist Hospital and I became a father, I thought of your grandfather and, foolish though it may seem, hoped that in some way he could hear, across the infinity between the living and the dead, your proud statement of arrival. For if he could hear, he would recognise the distinct voice of family, the sound of hope and new beginnings that you and all your innocence and freshness have brought to the world.”

Among the materials within ‘A Letter To Daniel’ that registered with me was the subtitle, “Amidst all the evil of this world my dear son, yours is the cry of hope.” And he had seen much, and we could list more since, including Iraq and Afghanistan. And we could add more from what takes place in the darker social side of the UK.

It takes me back to when speaking to the serpent (or Satan) God promised in Genesis 3:15, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head and you will strike his heel.”

Our first parents lost their dominion over the world given to them by God through the medium of a serpent and so joined with the rebel archangel in his rebellion against God (Genesis 3; Revelation 12:7-9). The consequences resulted in suffering and death for themselves and the whole human family, “As in Adam we all die, . .” (Romans 5:12).

But God gave them a promise that Someone born into the human family like them, would deliver them from the slavery and bondage in which they had placed themselves, and us! (1 Corinthians 15:22-23). Genesis 3:15 was the initial promise of human redemption. And so I can imagine the wonder and elation Adam and Eve must have experienced when after a successful pregnancy, Cain was born! It was the world’s first human birth. They would have been even more emotional than Fergal Keene over his newborn Daniel. Adam and Eve had never seen such a miracle before! Cain was unique! And I am sure we can appreciate Eve’s feelings when she cries out, “With the help of the Lord I have brought forth a man” (Genesis 4:1)

Little did she realise that this little innocent baby would grow up to become the world’s first murderer (Genesis 4:1-8). One can only guess at how those hopes were dashed and after such wonder at the birth of her children, with what depth she sunk in her grief.

And so our first parents died without seeing the promise, and so was the case for their children and subsequent generations. The promise of a Redeemer was repeated through patriarchs and prophets, yet He did not come!

Coming down to the people of Isaiah’s day they may well have wondered if they had not believed in a false hope. Assyria had conquered the 10 northern tribes of Israel in 722 BC and now surrounded Jerusalem itself with the promise of the same fate! As we read Isaiah 36, we can get a picture of how ominous this fate was that loomed over Jerusalem. Such were the times of Isaiah’s day that even the faithful could not have been blamed for doubting the promise of God!

And so Isaiah, whose name is “The Lord is our help,” in the apparent gloom and despair of his day, renews God’s promise to Israel in Isaiah 9:6:

For to us a child is born, to us a Son is given, and the government will be on His shoulders. And He will be called Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting father, Prince of Peace.”

Isaiah was affirming God’s promise to Judah that had been handed down to God’s people ever since it had been given to our first parents. It will happen! Isaiah assures.

And as if to reassure the people locked up in the siege of Jerusalem by the Assyrians, we read in chapters 36 and 37 of Isaiah that the angel of the Lord destroyed 185,000 of the Assyrian army in one night. Chapter 37:37 says, “Sennacherib broke camp and withdrew. He returned to Nineveh and stayed there.”

The promised Deliverer was assured through Isaiah the prophet, “For to us a child is born.” The mighty God would be miraculously and uniquely born into the human family, and forever identify Himself with us. Just like any other child, he would be born to a human mother. But unlike any other child he would be born of the Holy Spirit. He would be unique, both Son of Man and Son of God (Luke 1:35). He would, like any of us be dependent and trusting in a mother’s care and love. He would learn to grow and adjust in the human family, just like any other child of the human race.

He would experience pains and heartache. He would know grief and sorrow, and He would know what it was to shed tears, and even die – die to pay the price of sin for everyone (Romans 6:23). Adam had sold out the human race to Satan, the prince of this world, and the only way God could regain the kingdom, was to become one of us! “For to us a child is born,” for that very reason, as we sing in the carol, “born that man no more may to die,” born to set us free from sin and death (Hebrews 2:14)!

He would be called, “Wonderful Counsellor.” He would get through life without sin, and give us the benefit of His success (Hebrews 2:14-154:14-16). That was the purpose of His coming. Despite the anti-Christian culture developing around us in our Western world, the benefits of Christ’s Counselling is still seen every day in the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit in the changed lives of people today.

But then, Isaiah tells us why this Wonderful Counsellor is able to perform miracles within human hearts. The prophet takes a leap from, “for to us a child is born” to, “The Mighty God“!

It was the kind of leap that doubting Thomas had to make when he uttered that confession, “My Lord and my God” (John 20:28). That is who the Bible says Jesus is. Colossians 1:16 says he was the First Cause; “For by Him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were made by Him and for Him.” The Apostle John in his Gospel, in chapter 1:3 says, “Through Him all things were made; without Him nothing was made that has been made.”

And even more amazing is Isaiah’s next declaration that His name is also “Everlasting Father.” Many people would like to make a distinction between Jesus and the Father, because Jesus became a “Son.” As someone has put it, His human birth was His condescension, not His obligation! Reading Vol. I, a discourse on the Person of Christ by Puritan John Owen, a phrase etched itself in my mind not to be forgotten, “He did not give up what He was, but He became what he was not!” Uniquely, God became man, for a unique purpose described by the Apostle Paul in Philippians 2:5-8. Jesus could say, “I and the Father are One” (John 10:30). He knows the part of both.

Then says Isaiah, He shall be known as the “Prince of Peace.” Matthew records Jesus as saying, “I have not come to send peace but a sword.” But there is no paradox. Peace with God is only through the Cross. It was in the cross that he reconciled us to himself (Colossians 1:19-20). When God promised to create enmity between Satan’s seed and God’s children (Genesis 3:15), Jesus came to make that enmity more real!

It was the Cross that showed us the awfulness of sin in contrast to the love of God. It was on the cross that we see evil for what it is, over against God’s goodness and self-giving. As the Apostle Paul puts in Romans 5:8, “While we were still sinners, Christ died for us.” And that cross opened up the reality of a new life in Christ. In 2 Corinthians 5:17 it says, “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation.”

In John 14:27 Jesus says, “Peace I leave with you; My peace I give you. I do not give to you as the world gives. Do not let your hearts be troubled and do not be afraid.”

At Christ’s birth, the angels had announced, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will towards men.” But this peace and good will has to be worked at; the forces of evil are still here! We have our own tendency to self-centredness. The world is always with us, whether Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria or the Sudan, or at home in the violence and crime of our own communities. Enmity to God’s kingdom is still here!

But Isaiah’s message reminds us that Christ’s birth was no temporary injection in the arm for ailing humankind. Instead, it is a guarantee of God’s intention for working out a permanent solution for the ills of this sin-ridden world. John 3:16 says, “For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him, shall not perish but have eternal life.” There is a life beyond the now for those who put their faith in Jesus Christ.

Hebrews 9:28 says, “So Christ was sacrificed to take away the sins of many people; and He will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for Him.”

And then will come to pass the Apostle John’s description of the future. In Revelation 21:1 he writes,

Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away.” And then in verse 4 he says, “And He (God) will wipe away all tears from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away.”

We are assured that sin and rebellion will not repeat itself. The certainty of all our hope in Christ is centred in the historic fact that God became flesh, and dwelt among us. The Incarnation of God in Jesus Christ was God carrying out His purpose for reclaiming a lost world.

Said Fergal Keene back in 1996 in his letter to his son, “Amidst the evil of this world my dear son, yours is the cry of hope” As we listen to the local and the world news, history has shown the world hasn’t changed any since Cain killed his brother Abel!

But despite all that is bad that we see taking place in the world, the message of the prophet Isaiah still speaks to us today. God’s intention for this world will be realised. It is worth repeating and remembering, “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). It’s down to our choice of whose’ side we are on. His first Advent assures us there will be a Second Advent when all is going to be put right (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; 1 Corinthians 15:51-57).

There is to be no more suffering or death or heartache. God’s new world order will be one where only the meek shall inherit the earth (Matthew 5:5). They are the meek – not the weak. Whatever harm may come to them in this life, they live under the protection of the Mighty God, the Everlasting Father and Prince of Peace in this life, and forever in the life to come.

It is what the Apostle Paul called the ‘Blessed Hope’ — “the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13). Our joy and peace and hope are in the reality of the promises of God. And that is what Isaiah wanted to tell the people of his day, and it still is as relevant for us in our day: “For to us a child is born, to us a Son is given, and the government will be on His shoulders. And He will be called, Wonderful Counsellor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of peace.

Happy Christmas.

Posted in Gospel, Incarnation, Jesus, Salvation, Second Advent, The Advent, The Resurrection | Comments Off on Unto Us A Child Is Born

Grace Has Arrived On The Scene

“God has given us good news. The good news is that grace has arrived on the scene. Grace has been given to desperate, fallen humanity. The gospel is the message of grace, which saves us when we first become a Christian., but the gospel continues to preach to us—day after day—that God’s grace is enough for us. God loves sinners. What a wonder that is!! There is no greater news. There is no greater message. God’s grace has arrived. And it is found in His Son, the Lord Jesus,” says Paul Tautges,

 

Posted in Christ's Sacrifice, Gospel, Incarnation, Jesus, Justification & Sanctification, Salvation, Saved by Faith, Saved By Grace, The New Birth | Comments Off on Grace Has Arrived On The Scene